August 2011
Regional and local firms (defined as those within borrowing countries) win a substantial and increasing share of International Financial Institution (IFI) funded contracts. Partnering with local firms is therefore a critical success factor in winning IFI funded projects for several reasons:
The following charts offer a snapshot of contracts awarded ($ value) to borrowing vs. non-borrowing country firms in 2009 at three IFIs and demonstrates the overall trend of local companies winning IFI procurement:



More and more firms are establishing local companies, or entering into joint ventures and other strategic alliances with active local partners to establish market presence and enhance their chances of winning IFI procurement. Increasingly, foreign firms are also now subcontracting to local firms. Subcontracting with international firms that have IFI experience enables a company to gain experience in a specific country and reduces the cost of responding to Expressions of Interest (EOIs) and Requests for Proposals (RFPs).
African Development Bank (AfDB) - As a percentage of the total number of contracts, firms and suppliers registered in borrowing member countries won 87% of AfDB-funded contracts in 2007, 88% in 2008 and 90% in 2009. However, less than 50% of the dollar value of contracts is won by local suppliers. Firms from non-borrowing countries continue to win the majority of the higher value projects.
| 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-Borrowing Countries | 51% | 57% | 54% | 65% |
| Borrowing Countries | 49% | 42% | 46% | 35% |
Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) - Latin American companies continue to win more and more of the business funded from IDB loans. Until about 2000, the IDB's non-borrowing countries routinely won anywhere from 60-70% of annual procurement. Since 2000, with increased capacity and experience, suppliers from Latin America and the Caribbean have become more competitive technically and financially, and have steadily increased their share of procurement to over 90% of total procurement.
| 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-Borrowing Countries | 28% | 5% | 5% | 5% | 3% |
| Borrowing (LAC) Countries | 70% | 95% | 95% | 95% | 97% |
World Bank (WB) - In the last ten years, non-OECD countries have consistently won the majority of World Bank funded contracts which is a marked contrast from earlier years.
| 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OECD Countries | 26% | 29% | 21% | 18% | 29% |
| Non OECD Countries | 74% | 71% | 79% | 82% | 71% |
Steps to finding a partner include profiling the ideal partner, searching for and identifying prospective partners, contacting and meeting prospects, and assessing your preferred choice of partner.
Decide what skills and experience you require and what traits are important to you. Examples of issues to consider include:
It is advised when meeting potential prospects that you try and schedule meetings to take place in their offices as this enables you to assess human resources, technical capabilities, etc.
Identify key decision makers and involve them early.
Make the most of your meetings by being prepared to ask a lot of questions as well as promote why this firm should want to partner with you (bring brochures, PPTs, etc. to highlight what you bring to the table). Remember that a good local partner will likely have many suitors.
Once you have identified a firm that meets your criteria, undertake due diligence.
Most due diligence can be carried out through internet searches, inquiries to Embassies and High Commissions, etc. However, you can also hire firms to provide you with a more detailed background check on your potential partner.
Partnering is used to describe strategic alliances, joint ventures, and teaming arrangements. Some arrangements will be one-off contract driven agreements, while others will be collaborations for longer periods of time.
In any relationship or partnership there may be a risk of disagreements or misunderstandings. These can be exacerbated by cross-cultural differences or time pressures. Companies must be aware of the reputational, financial and legal risks involved in order to protect themselves when going abroad. While there are risks in partnerships, these can be managed. Be sure to fully assess the firms/individuals with whom you are considering a partnership. Once you have selected a firm, carry out due diligence and ensure that agreements and expectations are understood and communicated. Approach partnerships with something to offer rather than focusing simply on what you can gain.
Scope of work and deliverables, time frame and milestones, contract amount and payment terms and conditions of working together should all be clearly defined from the outset of any partnership agreement.
This could include discussions on:
You may also want to outline how you will handle conditions governing follow-on work with the client, and methods for resolving disagreements.
In discussions with potential partners during the Expressions of Interest and Request for Proposal stage, keep exclusivity in mind. IFIs have guidelines pertaining to local consultants / firms being included in more than one bid so you'll want to address this with your potential partner.
1 Where goods are concerned, local preference is not stated outright. However, due to shipping and taxes, local firms often have an advantage. Firms operating in goods are encouraged to develop local partnerships to add value and to improve their distribution channels.